Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

February 2026

Delivering dental care in rural schools using telehealth

By News

Source: Telehealth.HHS.gov

By the age of 8, over half of children in the U.S. have had a cavity. Cavities and dental disease can affect children’s education. Telehealth is a tool that may help increase access to oral health care.

The University of California San Francisco’s School of Dentistry is training dental residents to use telehealth. Both a dental assistant and hygienist see each child in person at their school. They document the child’s dental needs. This information is sent to people training to be a children’s dentist, called a pediatric dental resident. These residents are overseen by dentists. The dental residents review the information and create a dental care treatment plan. The school-based dental team in the rural area then uses this plan to provide care.

The school-based dental team offers a full range of services. This includes x-rays, assessments, cleanings, and treatment. Some children need more advanced care. These children are referred to community dentists. However, the community dentists may not be able to see the child for several months. The school dental team provides treatment to prevent cavities from getting worse during this time. “If we can bring dentistry to children at the school [through telehealth], we can at least keep them healthy and reduce the need to go to the dentist.”

The school-based team also helps students understand the importance of dental health. The number of children needing advanced dental care has decreased over the past four years since the program began. In addition, because the program uses telehealth, dental residents learn how to provide virtual dental care.

There have been some challenges with delivering dental care virtually. The program views these as an opportunity to expand the skills of dentists treating children living in rural areas. Some children need care that requires special skills. To address this, the project team aims to set up virtual training programs to teach community dentists new skills. Moving forward, the program is thinking about new opportunities to train community dentists and use telehealth.

Virtual Health Care Not Just for Mental Health, Study Finds

By News

By University of Utah Health

Telehealth visits are commonly used for mental and behavioral health care, and since the days of the early pandemic, patients have increasingly used virtual meetings with doctors to meet other health care needs. But the full scope of who’s accessing health care remotely—and why—is less clear.

A new study of Medicare patients across the country has found that nearly half of telehealth visits are for non-mental health conditions, often chronic conditions like diabetes or high blood pressure. The results provide a crucial foundation to help shape health care policies and practices to make quality care accessible to all.

The results are published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Many virtual appointments are for common chronic conditions

The researchers examined health care visit data from a nationally representative sample of nearly 15,000 Medicare users during 2021 to 2023 to learn how telehealth is being used nationwide. Nearly half of mental health appointments were performed remotely, amounting to 31 million annual visits. But there were almost as many telehealth appointments for non-mental health conditions: 29 million annually.

The vast majority of these visits were for common health conditions like diabetes and high blood pressure, for which the sheer number of medical visits outweighs the relatively small fraction of these visits that are performed virtually.

“We were surprised at the number of non-mental health conditions, like high blood pressure or diabetes, that were commonly addressed through telehealth,” says Terrence Liu, MD, assistant professor of internal medicine at University of Utah Health and the first author on the study. “Even though a smaller percentage of these visits were conducted through telehealth, because these are very common conditions, the total number of estimated visits was very similar to telehealth visits for mental health conditions, numbering in the tens of millions.”

Telehealth may alleviate barriers to care

The data suggests that people who are most medically vulnerable are more likely to use telehealth, the researchers say. Telehealth users are more likely to report limitations in activities of daily living, like bathing and getting dressed, and are more likely to report worse health overall. Liu speculates that telehealth might be especially useful for people with more medical challenges, helping to alleviate barriers to care that these populations might disproportionally face. “If you’re able to receive care at home, then it can potentially overcome some of those barriers,” he says.

The results show that telehealth is an important avenue of care for non-mental health conditions, the researchers say.

Knowing who uses telehealth, and why, can help guide informed decisions about how health systems provide care, which may help lead to more certainty for patients about how their care will be delivered and covered on an ongoing basis.

“Navigating the insurance labyrinth of Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and supplemental plans is already a complicated task for any older adult,” says Alexander Chaitoff, MD, assistant professor of internal medicine at University of Michigan and second author on the paper. “Having more certainty on whether their telehealth care will be supported on a more permanent basis could be helpful, given how important it is for managing chronic conditions.”

“It’s hard to imagine going back to a world where telehealth is a tiny fraction of all the health care that’s delivered,” Liu says. “It’s not the predominant mode of delivery, and it still has issues that need to be worked out. But I think with greater confidence and support for making telehealth coverage more permanent for non-mental health conditions, health systems will have additional incentive to invest in it and find ways to improve it.”

 

###

Liu began the research during his time in the National Clinician Scholars Program at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation. Chaitoff and senior author Chad Ellimoottil are current members of IHPI.

The research is published in Annals of Internal Medicine as “Telehealth Utilization and Health Conditions Addressed Among the U.S. Medicare Population.

This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development Service.

Federal Telehealth Policy in 2026: What the Medicare Extensions Mean

By News

By Julia Ivanova, PhD, MA (Telehealth.org)

Key Takeaways

  • Many Medicare telehealth flexibilities were extended through Dec. 31, 2027 under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026.
  • A review of behavioral telehealth policies that are permanent, including home-based care, audio-only services, and expanded clinician eligibility.
  • Stakeholders are increasingly pushing for stand-alone telehealth legislation to reduce disruption caused by reliance on short-term funding bills.

Federal telehealth policy in 2026 is in transition following Congress’s action to end a partial government shutdown and extend several Medicare telehealth provisions. However, many key flexibilities remain temporary, and lawmakers are now turning to broader legislation to provide long-term stability.

On Feb. 3, 2026, Congress approved a funding package, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 (H.R. 7148), along with a two-week continuing resolution to fund the Department of Homeland Security, bringing an end to the partial government shutdown and reinstating key telehealth flexibilities for multiple years. The legislation extends Medicare telehealth flexibilities through Dec. 31, 2027. These flexibilities include waiving the in-person requirement for Medicare behavioral telehealth visits, allowing home as an originating site and geographic waivers, and expanding Medicare clinician eligibility. The flexibilities also allow Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Centers (RHCs) to serve as distant-site telehealth providers for Medicare patients, and allow audio-only telehealth services. Find further information on telehealth items included in the funding package here.

Section 6209 of the funding package also states the renewal of the Acute Hospital at Home Program through Sept. 30, 2030, and continues in-home cardiopulmonary rehabilitation flexibilities through Jan. 1, 2028. The bill also requires the Department of Health and Human Services to issue guidance within one year on providing telehealth services to individuals with limited English proficiency. It expands the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program to include virtual diabetes suppliers through Dec. 31, 2029.

Temporary Extensions And Their Impact

The reinstated Medicare telehealth flexibilities under the funding package renew policies that had previously lapsed or were set to lapse amid the 2025-26 funding negotiations. These include waivers that allow beneficiaries to receive telehealth services in their homes regardless of geographical location and expanded provider eligibility for occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech-language pathologists, and audiologists: all provisions created during the COVID-19 public health emergency and repeatedly extended through short-term legislative action.

Despite bipartisan support for telehealth, most of these policies remain temporary. Congress has historically extended such flexibilities through continuing resolutions and omnibus packages, a strategy that has often left Medicare telehealth coverage and reimbursement vulnerable to shutdown negotiations and deadlines.

What Is Permanent

Even amid these stopgap measures, some telehealth flexibilities had already been made permanent, most notably in the behavioral health space. Medicare’s expanded coverage for behavioral telehealth is established as a permanent Medicare benefit.

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 eliminated long-standing Medicare restrictions on behavioral health telemedicine, expanding where and how mental health services may be delivered. The law allows Medicare beneficiaries to receive behavioral health care from any location, including their homes, and removes the requirement that patients be located in rural areas. It also authorized the use of audio-only technology for behavioral health visits when patients are unable to access or decline real-time video services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) later incorporated these changes into the 2022 Physician Fee Schedule, clarifying that clinicians must be able to offer video services and document the reason for providing audio-only care.

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 further expanded Medicare behavioral health telehealth by broadening the range of clinicians and facilities able to bill for telehealth. Beginning Jan. 1, 2024, marriage and family therapists and mental health counselors were recognized as Medicare telehealth practitioners, allowing them to enroll in Medicare and bill for virtual behavioral health services. The law also permanently designated FQHCs and RHCs as distant-site providers for behavioral telehealth, enabling clinicians based in those settings to be reimbursed for delivering virtual behavioral health care to Medicare beneficiaries regardless of patient location.

These permanent behavioral telehealth policies stand in contrast to the broader set of flexibilities for general telehealth services, which, under the latest legislative action, continue only through specific future dates rather than enduring law.

Toward Stand-alone Legislation in 2026

With the shutdown ended and temporary coverage secured through 2027 for many policies, the focus of telehealth advocates and lawmakers will likely shift to passing stand-alone telehealth legislation. Proposed measures, such as the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to make a broader suite of telehealth flexibilities permanent, reducing the recurring uncertainty created by attaching critical coverage to must-pass funding bills.

Without statutory protections, providers and patients will continue to face episodic disruptions and administrative complexities whenever Congress confronts budget deadlines. In a Brown University policy brief, during the 2025 shutdown, there was a 24% drop in the first 17 days compared with prior months, with individual states such as Florida, Louisiana, and New York seeing even more precipitous drops of 40% or more. The same policy brief noted that telehealth levels returned to the levels seen before the December shutdown. However, even while many can resume telehealth easily, others may find a short lapse in coverage consequential to their health, such as patients using the Acute Hospital at Home program. With all this considered, health care groups such as the American Medical Association have pressed Congress to enact permanent authorization of Medicare telehealth services. After all, even with Congress’s action this year providing a multiyear runway, these flexibilities are not the lasting certainty many clinicians and health systems seek.

Disclosures:

  • This article was developed with AI-assisted research tools and edited by the Telehealth News editorial team for accuracy and clarity.

Government Shutdown Ends, Reinstating Hospital-at-Home, Medicare Telehealth Flexibilities

By News

By Morgan Gonzales, HomeHealthCareNews.com

On Tuesday [February 3, 2026], Congress and President Donald Trump passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, reopening the government after it partially shut down for three days, pausing two measures important to the home-based care community.

The bill, passed following a political backlash to funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), funds most of the government through Sept. 30, 2026. It extends certain telehealth flexibilities for two years and extends the Medicare Acute Hospital Care at Home waiver for five years.

On the telehealth flexibility front, the funding package allows the face-to-face visit to be performed via telehealth – a flexibility that extends home health providers’ patient pools and avoids some back-office burden. While home health providers will benefit from this extended flexibility, the funding package does not allow for telehealth flexibilities for hospice providers in some circumstances, including if the person receiving hospice care is located in an area where CMS has placed a moratorium on enrolling hospice providers and if the person is receiving care from a provider subject to the Provisional Period of Enhanced Oversight (PPEO). The National Alliance for Care at Home said in a statement that the organization was “concerned” about these limitations for hospices.

For the hospital-at-home waiver program, the five-year extension adds an element of at least short-term certainty after the program has been kept alive by a series of short-term measures. Regulatory uncertainty has caused a “wait and see” moment for the industry, and was cited as the reason for Inbound Health’s closure.

“For patients, this means fewer disruptive hospital stays, more healing at home, and greater access to high-quality acute care – especially for older adults and those in rural communities,” Pippa Shulman, chief medical officer of hospital-at-home operator DispatchHealth, said in a LinkedIn post. “For health systems, it provides the stability needed to invest in innovation, build teams and scale programs that reduce crowding, improve outcomes and meet people where they are.”

Additionally, the bill streamlines the enrollment process for providers serving people under 21 in a state other than their primary Medicaid enrollment.

“Notably, it is unclear whether any home care providers would qualify as home health and hospice are deemed ‘moderate risk’ by CMS and states are not allowed to classify providers at a lower level of risk than CMS,” the Alliance said in a statement. “Similarly, personal care, private duty nursing, and other non-Medicare home care providers are largely classified as moderate or high risk under the state programs.”

While the bill gives a multi-year runway for both the hospital-at-home waiver program and Medicare telehealth flexibilities, advocates still push to make these flexibilities permanent.

“These extensions provide critical stability and certainty for patients and health care providers but also underscore the work still ahead,” Alexis Apple, deputy executive director of ATA Action and vice president of public affairs at the ATA, said in a statement. “These multi-year extensions will give government agencies, legislators and advocates needed time to hammer out the details of permanent provisions.”

Hospice Telehealth Flexibilities Expire, Reinstatement Likely

By News

By Jim Parker, HospiceNews.com

 

An extension of the COVID-era telehealth flexibilities is wallowing in Congress but will likely pass soon. The flexibilities expired Jan. 30.

The extension is tied up in a funding bill for several federal agencies. The bill has been stymied by debate over funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amid concern over aggressive tactics used by those agents in several U.S. cities. This has led to a partial government shutdown. However, many observers believe that the telehealth provision will move forward within the coming week.

“It is likely the shutdown will be short-lived, expected to end next week when House members are expected to return for a vote,” the National Alliance for Care at Home indicated in an alert to its members. “The Alliance recommends that home health agencies and hospices prepare for the telehealth flexibilities to end on Jan. 30, as we have previously recommended. While it would be anticipated that there would be a retroactive approval of the telehealth flexibilities that covers the anticipated short shutdown period, it is not guaranteed.”

The telehealth extension provisions are contained in a single-package appropriations legislation, which would extend the flexibilities through the end of 2027. This includes the ability of hospices to perform patient re-certification face-to-face encounters via telehealth.

This would also include waivers that expanded the scope of practitioners eligible to provide telehealth services, as well as flexibilities that removed geographic requirements and expanded originating sites for telehealth services, including federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

Hospices and other health care providers have increasingly relied on virtual services over the past five years under telehealth waivers, particularly to reach patients in rural and remote areas with limited access to care.

Telehealth has enabled hospices to serve a growing patient population amid rising demand and persistent staffing shortages intensified by the pandemic. Virtual care has also expanded support for patients and caregivers, allowing providers to reduce unnecessary home visits while better managing clinician workloads.

CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz in his Senate confirmation hearing indicated that expanding telehealth utilization is a “major focus” for the agency.

“Congress has a responsibility to extend telehealth widely throughout the nation, and as it was during COVID …” Oz said. “It is a major focus of mine, and if confirmed, it’s one of the areas I think we’ll be able to make major inroads, because there are no opponents to this.”

However, no CMS action on telehealth has materialized to date.

The expiration, even if short lived, could create widespread disruption for hospice providers, according to Logan Hoover, vice president of policy and government relations for the National Alliance for Care at Home.

“There will be a tremendous amount of unnecessary disruption. This flexibility has been in place for almost six years; it has become a standard part of operations,” Hoover previously told Hospice News. “The consequence for a hospice using telehealth during a lapse in authority to conduct the face-to-face visit could be not being paid at all for the entire benefit period, making the hospice liable for thousands of dollars. Worse, the requirement could delay a patient’s access to hospice care if the visit is required before service begins.”